USPTO serial 85078522
WW WONDERFUL WICKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WW WONDERFUL WICKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charleston, SC, US
Charleston, SC, US
Charleston, SC, US
Charleston, SC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James P. Broder
James P. Broder ROEDER & BRODER LLP4817 Biona Dr.SAN DIEGO, CA 92116United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Candles; Scented candles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MVP Group International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MVP Group International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MVP Group International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MVP Group International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named WW WONDERFUL WICKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Oct 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |