USPTO serial 85078653
HRG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HRG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denise I. Mroz
Denise I. Mroz Woodcock Washburn LLP2929 Arch Street, Cira Centre, 12th Flr.Philadelphia, PA 19104-2891UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Customized patient services portals for use in the healthcare industry, namely, bedside computer monitors and television monitors that provide entertainment and patient information; Customized patient services portals for use in the healthcare industry in the nature of bedside computer hardware and software for use with medical patient monitoring equipment, for receiving, processing, transmitting and displaying data; Customized patient services portals for use in the healthcare industry in the nature of bedside computer hardware and software for controlling and managing patient medical information; Computer operating software for patient services portals in the healthcare industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of computer hardware for patient services portals in the healthcare industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Broadcasting services and provision of telecommunication access to video content, television programs, and cable television programs provided via a video-on-demand service; Providing access to telecommunication networks; Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics and video by means of broadband optical or wireless networks; Telecommunication services, namely, providing internet access via broadband optical or wireless networks; Telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services; Transfer of data by telecommunication | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Television and cable television programming; Programming of videos, television, cable television, and internet programs on a global computer network; Provision of non-downloadable videos and television programmes via a video-on-demand service | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer hardware and software design and customization for patient services portals in the healthcare industry; Installation and maintenance of computer software for patient services portals in the healthcare industry; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for operating patient services portals in the healthcare industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Health care services; Telemedicine services; Telehealth services in the nature of provision of health care and medical services by health care professionals via the Internet or telecommunication networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HRG Healthcare Resource Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HRG Healthcare Resource Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named HRG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |