USPTO serial 85078794
CONSILIUM SOFTWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONSILIUM SOFTWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Lafayette, IN
West Lafayette, IN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for unified communications via audio, video, chat, conference and web in the field of designing, integrating, controlling and monitoring of enterprise communication hardware and software in telecommunication systems comprised of central and private telephone switches, voice response units, computer software used for managing internal and customer communications through multiple channels via telephone, e-mail and web; Computer software for customer contact centers via telephone, e-mail and web in the field of designing, integrating, controlling and monitoring of customer contact center hardware and software in telecommunication systems comprised of central and private telephone switches, voice response units and telephone dialers; Computer software for use in managing customer contact centers and customer contacts through multiple channels, namely, software for managing and routing customer contact via telephone, e-mail and web | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |