USPTO serial 85079905
ODDJECTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ODDJECTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Glen Haven, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Freedman
SUSAN FREEDMAN ROBERTS MLOTKOWSKI SAFRAN & COLE P.C.7918 JONES BRANCH DR STE 500MC LEAN, VA 22102-3366UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Household items, namely, candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Personal items, namely, metal key chains; household items, namely, baskets of common metals; decorative items, namely, sculptures made of non-precious metal, metal hooks; seasonal items, namely, decorative ornaments in the nature of holiday ornaments of common metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household items, namely, plates, bowls, mugs drinking glasses, baskets for domestic use not of metal, vases, butlers' trays, meal trays, serving trays, salt and pepper shakers, tea pots, coffee pots, serving tools in the nature of serving forks, ladles, spoons and tongs, coasters not of paper and not being table linen, charger plates, napkin rings, garbage cans; decorative items, namely, sculptures of clay, porcelain, ceramic, wood and glass; decorative items, namely, menu cardholders, business cardholders, vases; small furniture items, namely, birdcages; gardening items, namely, planters for flowers and plants; seasonal items, namely, decorative ornaments in the nature of glass, ceramic, porcelain, plastic and wood | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Decorative items, namely, soft sculpture dolls and plush toys; seasonal items, namely, decorative ornaments in the nature of Christmas tree ornaments; children's items, namely, plush toys and wooden toys | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Café featuring, coffee, cookies, pastries, sandwiches, salads, quiches and pizza | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oddjects Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named ODDJECTS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |