USPTO serial 85080247
L.A.P
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with L.A.P?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Concannon, Esq.
PATRICK J CONCANNON EDWARDS WILDMAN PALMER LLP111 HUNTINGTON AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02199UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Cosmetics bags sold empty; leather bags; synthetic leather bags; duffel bags; beach bags; book bags; shoulder bags; reusable shopping bags; leather suitcases; leather purses; leather handbags; Boston bags; traveling trunks; handbags; parasols, namely, sun umbrellas; umbrellas; vanity cases sold empty; multipurpose purses; leather key purses; briefcases; traveling bags; purses; umbrella accessories, namely, umbrella bags; leather; clothing for pets; garments for pets; animal wraps and covers | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Footwear; parts and fittings of footwear, namely, shoe pegs, insoles, soles, footwear uppers, welts, heelpieces, tips; iron fittings for shoes, namely, protective metal members for shoes; clothing consisting of leatherwear, namely, suits, trousers and pants, and skirts; clothing and apparel for women, namely, suits, pants, slacks, dress pants, dresses, skirts, shirts, dress shirts, blouses, polo shirts, party and ceremonial dresses, wedding dresses, underwear, night gowns and pajamas; clothing for men, namely, pants, dress shirts, polo shirts, suits, tuxedos, pajamas; clothing for children, namely, shirts, t-shirts, pants, shorts, skirts, jeans, and dresses; outerwear, namely, raincoats, overcoats, half-coats and pea coats, jackets for protection against the cold, namely, down jackets, thermal jackets, parkas; sportswear, namely, golf trousers, polo shirts, anoraks, skiwear; safari suits; headgear, namely, leather hats and caps, golf caps, night caps, knit caps and hats, manggon, namely, a Korean headband made of horsehair, fur hats, berets, baseball caps, visors, wool hats, skull caps, caps with visors; children's headwear, namely, caps and hats, hoods, paper clothing hats; socks, ear muffs, gloves for protection against the cold, mufflers; masks for protection against the cold, namely, ski masks; leather belts, garters, gaiter straps, stocking suspenders, sock suspenders, suspender belts, braces for clothing, belts, fabric belts for wear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |