USPTO serial 85080629
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, BC, CA
Vancouver, BC, CA
Vancouver, BC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa L. Heywood
MELISSA L. HEYWOOD RICHARDS BUELL SUTTON LLP700 - 401 WEST GEORGIA STREETVANCOUVER, BC, V6B5A1CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring health and beauty products, namely, health spa products, skin, hair, nail, hand, foot and body care products and preparations, bath products and preparations, cosmetics and make-up, self-tanning and sun-tanning preparations, aromatherapy products and essential oils, perfumes, fragrances and colognes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Providing health spa services and esthetician services offered in or from a remote, mobile or temporary on-site location, namely, cosmetic body care services, body wraps, body buffs being cosmetic body care services, body scrubs, face and body masks, mud and seaweed treatments, hydrotherapy baths, personal hair removal services, microdermabrasion services, namely, a topical skin treatment involving abrasion of the skin with a high-pressure flow of crystals, cellulite treatments, body contouring treatments, and providing facials, manicures, pedicures, ayurvedic therapies, namely, warm oil massages, massages, personal hair removal and electrolysis, make-up application, eyebrow tints, eyebrow shaping and spray tans, namely, skin tanning services for humans for cosmetic purposes; Hair salon services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 20, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |