USPTO serial 85080736
COMPLEXIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMPLEXIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Lippman
Robert A. Lippman Lemery Greisler LLC60 Railroad Place, Suite 502Saratoga Springs, NY 12866UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin, hair, body care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, sunscreen, make up, body lotion, body scrub, bath gel, bath salt | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 1987 |
| 035 | Retail store services and online retail store services featuring skin creams and gels, eye creams and balms, facial creams and washes, shaving creams and paraphernalia, skin toners, vitamin C topicals, anti-aging creams, lip repair treatments and balms, body polish, sunscreen, epidermal repair treatments, rejuvenating serums, facial and skin cleansers, body oils, herbal baths, moisture baths, lotions, sunless tanning products; Retail store services and online retail store services featuring hair products, namely shampoos, conditioners, styling products, hairsprays, thinning hair treatments, sunscreens for hair; Retail store services and online retail store services featuring cosmetic products, make-up, acrylic nails, false eyelashes, and diffusers | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 1987 |
| 044 | Health spa services, namely, massages, hot stone therapy, reflexology, essential oil treatment, bronzing treatment, cellulite treatment, facial treatment, acne treatment, wellness treatment, face and body exfoliation, facials, anti-aging skin therapies, clarifying mask application, hair removal, body waxing, makeup application, eyelash application, manicures, pedicures, paraffin treatment, nail polish application, nail art, nail repair, acrylic nail application, ear candleing, collagen face treatment, restorative eye treatment, body wrap application, massage therapy, balneotherapy, body polish application; Medical spa services, namely, chemical peels, anti-aging laser treatment, acne laser treatment, anti-oxidant therapy, exfoliating treatment, photofacials, laser hair removal, microdermabrasion, pre and post operative cosmetic surgery skin care; Hair salon services, namely, hair cuts, hair coloring, hair extensions, hair permanents, hair foils, shaves, and hair trims | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2010 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |