Drawing for PACHINKO.COM

USPTO serial 85081623

PACHINKO.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACHINKO.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven A. Gibson, Esq.

STEVEN A GIBSON DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC1875 EYE ST NWSUITE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20006

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041providing an on-line computer database in the field of gaming, athletic competition and entertainment informationACTIVENov 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 13, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 13, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 28, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 18, 2013RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Mar 18, 2013GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2013GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2013CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 17, 2012GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Nov 17, 2012GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Nov 17, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 2, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 28, 2012GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Apr 28, 2012GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Apr 28, 2012CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2012MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 20, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 20, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 20, 2012RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED—
Apr 18, 2012MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 18, 2012ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 30, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2011GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2011GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2011NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2010ZZBXALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION—
Oct 20, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 14, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance