USPTO serial 85082017
EAUVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EAUVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hadley Wood, Herts, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Aerated mineral waters; Aerated water; Aerated water; Beauty beverages, namely, fruit juices and energy drinks containing nutritional supplements; Bottled artesian water; Bottled drinking water; Bottled water; Carbonated waters; Distilled drinking water; Drinking water; Drinking water with vitamins; Drinking waters; Essences for making flavoured mineral water; Essences for making non-alcoholic beverages; Essences for the preparation of mineral waters; Flavored bottled water; Flavored waters; Flavoured mineral water; Flavoured waters; Fruit beverages; Fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of beverages; Fruit-based beverages; Fruit-flavored beverages; Fruit-flavoured beverages; Glacial water; Iced fruit beverages; Isotonic beverages; Mineral and aerated water; Mineral and aerated waters; Mineral and carbonated waters; Mineral water; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Purified bottled drinking water; Scented water for making beverages; Smoothies; Soda water; Sparkling water; Spring water; Still water; Still waters; Syrups for beverages; Syrups for making beverages; Syrups for making flavoured mineral waters; Table water; Table waters; Water beverages | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |