USPTO serial 85082488
HDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph M. Lafata
Joseph M. Lafata Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical test, measurement, and safety equipment, namely, voltmeters, phasing sets for determining phasing of conductors in power distribution and transmission applications, power testers, surge arrester testers, voltage leakage testers, transformer testers, capacitor testers, voltage detectors, ammeters, phase rotation meters, electrical load testers, voltage testers, continuity testers, capacitor controls, electronic recorders for recording data relating to power distribution, electrical power extension cords, cable fault testers, insulated hot stick poles for use on electric power lines, voltmeter proof testers for confirming proper operation of a voltmeter, phaser proof testers for confirming proper operation of phasers in power distribution and transmission applications, cable phase identifiers for determining proper cable phasing in power distribution applications, voltage indicators, power line insulator testers, dielectric integrity testers for ropes, slings, and straps, ammeter recorders, current recorders, and voltage level recorders; measuring apparatus, namely, meters for measuring cable sag, cable height distance, and overhead clearance; helmet safety lights, namely, hard hat lights | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Spot lights; flood lights | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship services in the field of electric utility products | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Utility related services, namely, custom machining and fabrication of electric utility products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HD Electric Company
- Other trademarks owned by HD Electric Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named HDE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |