USPTO serial 85082732
MOTTEGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOTTEGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa H. Meyerhoff
LISA H. MEYERHOFF BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP711 LOUISIANA ST STE 3400HOUSTON, TX 77002-2746UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Paints for interior and exterior purposes | ACTIVE | Jan 4, 2011 |
| 020 | Furniture, namely, end-tables, coffee tables, tables, chairs, desks, shelving, and screens; wall decorations, namely, mirrors and picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Carpets, rugs, mats and matting for covering existing floors; wall decorations, namely, non-textile wall hangings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lighthouse Import Company
- Other trademarks owned by Lighthouse Import Company
- Other trademarks owned by 4M CAPITAL, LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named MOTTEGA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |