Drawing for EXPRESSIONIST

USPTO serial 85083619

EXPRESSIONIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXPRESSIONIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Phi Lan M. Tinsley

PHI M TINSLEY K&L GATES LLPSTATE STREET FINANCIAL CENTERONE LINCOLN STREETBOSTON, MA 02111-2901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing an online service for business for exploratory research and concept testing, namely, business research, brand concept and brand development services for corporate and individual clients via an online website accessed through a global computer networkACTIVEJul 2, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 23, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 6, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 14, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 23, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 23, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 25, 2011GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
May 25, 2011GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
May 25, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 23, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 23, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance