USPTO serial 85083968
TALKING BUSINESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REINHART, MEGHAN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TALKING BUSINESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. Coleman
Brian R. Coleman PERKINS COIE, LLP3150 Porter DrivePalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software, namely, an application allowing sales and field service employees to update and receive data stored in an enterprise's computer databases in real time, using a mobile device, with full telephony integration with the telephone and/or software features of the mobile device; telephones; computer software for enabling voice-over-Internet-protocol (VoIP) communications; computer software in the field of telecommunications, namely, Private Branch Exchange (PBX) systems comprised of telephones, IP telephones, computer servers, and telephone switchboards and exchangers; computer software programs for use in integrating computer telephony in the field of computer networks; computer hardware and software appliance comprised of a server and disk drives for use in managing various aspects of communications for small businesses in the nature of voice, chat, messaging, email, telecommuter network management, router and security applications; computer software programs for managing and integrating call center queues | ACTIVE | Jul 14, 2010 |
| 038 | Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of telephony hardware, telephony software, Private Branch Exchange (PBX) systems and telephony systems; internet telephony services; telephony services, namely, managing and integrating call center queues | ACTIVE | Jul 7, 2010 |
| 041 | Conducting classes, seminars, webinars, educational conferences, and workshops in the fields of telecommunications and open source software, and distribution of course material in connection therewith; blogging regarding telecommunications, internet telephony and open source software; providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning telecommunication and open source software; providing a website that features information on telecommunications | ACTIVE | Jul 7, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |