Drawing for TM FORUM FRAMEWORX

USPTO serial 85086450

TM FORUM FRAMEWORX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TM FORUM FRAMEWORX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank L. Politano

FRANK L. POLITANO K&L GATES LLP1 NEWARK CTR FL 10NEWARK, NJ 07102-5237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use by telecommunications, cable, satellite and computer service providers in system design, process management and process definition and for use by suppliers for the telecommunications, cable, satellite and computer industry in developing reference enterprise architecture; electronic publications, namely, reports and manuals relating to the aforementioned computer software recorded on computer media; computer software for use by telecommunications, cable, satellite and computer service providers for information modelingACTIVE—
016Printed materials, namely, books, pamphlets, brochures, booklets, and forms relating to standards in the telecommunications, computer, cable, satellite and computer service fields; printed materials, namely, books, pamphlets, brochures, booklets and forms containing development specifications, strategies and implementation guides that define and promote the use of integrated technical standards to develop or procure network systems management application interfaces; printed reports and manuals relating to such computer softwareACTIVE—
035Promotion of services of others by exhibitions, trade shows and conferences in the field of the management of networked information systems and business management consultation services in the field of networked information systems; business consulting services in the field of setting standards for telecommunications, computer, cable, satellite and computer service providers and suppliers; business consulting services in the areas of benchmarking and conformance services; business services, namely, formulation of best practices for operational information technology, processes, and systems for telecommunications, computer, cable, satellite and computer service providers and suppliersACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting seminars, exhibitions, conferences, online public and private training, webinars and workshops on technical issues in the field of telecommunications and computers for telecommunications, cable, satellite and computer service providers and suppliers, and developing and distributing printed educational material in connection therewithACTIVE—
042Development of voluntary standards and specifications relating to operational information technology, processes, and systems for telecommunications, computer, cable, satellite and computer service providers and suppliers; development of best practice standards relating to operational information technology, processes, and systems for telecommunications, computer, cable, satellite and computer service providers and suppliers; providing benchmarking and conformance services, namely, development of voluntary standards for operational information technology, processes, and systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 3, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 2, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 10, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 9, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 27, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 17, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance