USPTO serial 85087212
THINKING MACHINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THINKING MACHINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin A. Costa
Benjamin A. Costa Ridder, Costa & Johnstone LLP12 Geary StreetSuite 701San Francisco, CA 94108Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Ad server, namely, a computer server for storing advertisements and delivering advertisements to websites; Automated process control system, namely, micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of industrial machinery, namely, turbines, generators and compressors; Automated systems, namely, software, hardware and communications devices for planning, scheduling, controlling, monitoring and providing information on transportation assets and parts thereof; Communications computers; Communications servers; Computer central processing units; Computer chassis; Computer hardware and computer peripheral devices; Computer hardware and software system for remotely monitoring environmental conditions and controlling devices within a building, facility, grounds, or designated spatial area; Computer hardware for telecommunications; Computers and instructional manuals sold as a unit; Desktop computers; Handheld personal computers (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Ad server, namely, a computer server for storing advertisements and delivering advertisements to websites; Automated process control system, namely, micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of industrial machinery, namely, turbines, generators and compressors; Automated systems, namely, software, hardware and communications devices for planning, scheduling, controlling, monitoring and providing information on transportation assets and parts thereof; Communications computers; Communications servers; Computer central processing units; Computer chassis; Computer hardware and computer peripheral devices; Computer hardware and software system for remotely monitoring environmental conditions and controlling devices within a building, facility, grounds, or designated spatial area; Computer hardware for telecommunications; Computer software for administration of computer networks; Computers and instructional manuals sold as a unit; Desktop computers; Handheld personal computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |