Drawing for END-TO-ENDLESS

USPTO serial 85087392

END-TO-ENDLESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with END-TO-ENDLESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adrienne L. White

ADRIENNE L. WHITE WRB-IP LLPPO BOX 476WADSWORTH, OH 44282-0476UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software, software platforms, telecommunications and data networking software and hardware for deployment of Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), Digital Television (DTV), High Definition Television (HDTV), Video on Demand (VOD), Mobile Television, and 3D Television, across full service wired or wireless broadband networks, for home automation of television, for television content control, and for television advertising; computer hardware and software for encoding and decoding television signals, for diagnostics and monitoring of television deployment systems and components; and parts and fittings for all of the foregoingACTIVE—
038Providing Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), Digital Television (DTV), High Definition Television (HDTV), Video on Demand (VOD), Mobile Television, and 3D Television broadcasting and transmission services to both fixed and mobile devices; Telecommunication consultation in the nature of technical consulting in the fields of Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), Digital Television (DTV), High Definition Television (HDTV), Video on Demand (VOD), Mobile Television, and 3D Television, and audio, text and visual data transmission and communication associated therewith; Providing technical analysis and consultation in the fields of Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), Digital Television (DTV), High Definition Television (HDTV), Video on Demand (VOD), Mobile Television, and 3D Television, to othersACTIVE—
042Internet Protocol Television (IPTV), Digital Television (DTV), High Definition Television (HDTV), Video on Demand (VOD), Mobile Television, and 3D Television related services, namely, computer software design, maintenance, consultancy, rental and programming, computer hardware rental and consultancy, and computer system analysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 29, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 27, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 26, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 27, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 26, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 13, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 11, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance