USPTO serial 85087938
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Dort
DAVID DORT DORT PATENT, P.C.PO BOX 320069ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-4069UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for database management in the field of human resources; software for the management of employee compensation and benefits; software providing organizational communication, namely, software for the transmission of data between two points; software featuring education instruction for improving employee productivity; software for providing data, analysis and feedback regarding employee performance and satisfaction; software for improving communications, namely, software for the transmission of data between two points; employee productivity tracking software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and maintenance of software for the management of human resources for others; design and maintenance of software for the management of employee compensation and benefits for others; design and maintenance of software providing organizational communication for others; design and maintenance of software for improving employee productivity for others; design and maintenance of software for providing data, analysis and feedback regarding employee performance and satisfaction for others; design and maintenance of software for improving intraorganationalization communications for others; design and maintenance of employee productivity tracking software for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |