Drawing for IMMUNATOR

USPTO serial 85089583

IMMUNATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMMUNATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD L MORRIS JR

RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ TrademarkRenewals.comPO BOX 398538c/o 1-800-4-TRADEMARKMIAMI BEACH, FL 33239-8538

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional and dietary supplement drinks that relieve and prevent fatigue; Dietary supplement drinks in the nature of vitamin and mineral beverages; Vitamin and mineral liquid dietary supplements; Nutritionally fortified beveragesACTIVE—
032Energy drinks; Drinking water with vitaminsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 24, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 24, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 29, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 29, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 29, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 9, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 17, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance