USPTO serial 85089683
IGNITRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IGNITRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas V. Smurzynski
THOMAS V. SMURZYNSKI NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLPIP DEPT100 N TRYON STCHARLOTTE, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional and dietary supplements, namely, meal replacement bars and energy bars all for promoting energy, good health and weight loss; nutritional and dietary supplements in powder, tablet and capsule form for promoting energy, good health and weight management; nutritional and dietary supplements in liquid form for promoting energy, good health and weight loss; medicinal herbal preparations, for promoting energy, good health and weight loss; nutraceuticals for use as a dietary supplement for promoting energy, good health and weight loss; vitamin and mineral supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 30, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |