Drawing for BE WHAT'S NEXT

USPTO serial 85090014

BE WHAT'S NEXT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE WHAT'S NEXT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa M. Martens

Lisa M. Martens Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed strategy guides for computer and video games; user manuals for computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals, computer software for business, home, education, and entertainment applications and operating-system, security, and development-related programs, computer networks, the internet, interactive television, computer and video games; magazines and newsletters concerning computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals, computer software for business, home, education, and entertainment applications and operating-system, security, and development-related programs, computer networks, the internet, interactive television, computer games, video games and computer-related education; pens; pencils; stationery; stationery-type portfolios; desk sets; pen and pencil holders; mounted and un-mounted photographs; posters; memo pads; binders; calendars; notebooks; note cardsACTIVE—
025shirts, sweatshirts, caps, night shirts, headwear, hats, visorsACTIVE—
035Providing consumer product information via the Internet relating to computer hardware and computer software productsACTIVE—
038Providing multiple-user access to data on the Internet in the field of computer communications software; electronic mail services; web messagingACTIVE—
042Providing consulting services in the selection and implementation of computer-based information systems for business, home, education, and entertainment applications and operating-system, security, and development-related programs; development and maintenance of web sites for others; authentication in the field of computer hardware, networks and software; computer hardware and software testing; update of computer software via computer and global communication networks; computer programming for others; providing information via the Internet in the field of the selection and implementation of computers, computer software, computer components and peripherals; provision of Internet search engines; providing temporary use of on-line, non-downloadable software for creation and management of documents and work groups; on-line mapping services; providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information, which include search engines and on-line web links to other web sites; technical support, namely, monitoring of telecommunication network systems for Internet services providers to optimize network communications and data transfers; providing information about the use of telecommunications hardware and telecommunications software and systems of others over computer networks, wireless networks and global communication networksACTIVE—
045Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerabilityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 27, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance