USPTO serial 85090323
ANELLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3988606Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 5, 2011
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANELLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SERGEI OREL
SERGEI OREL SERGI OREL LLC2125 CENTER AVE SUITE 616FORT LEE, NJ 07024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of fences, namely, barricades, basketweave, board on board, decorative, flat top gate, garden, grapestake, hi-low dog ear, lattice/lattice tops, lead free, non-climbable, ornamental, porch rail, privacy, razon ribbon, round rail, round top gate, security, shadow weave, slatted, snow, split rail, stockade and temporary construction, chain link fences, non-metal wire fences, wire mesh/barbed wire fences, vinyl fences, vinyl coated fences, wood fences, PVC fences, picket fences, arbors and trellises made of wood, concrete retaining walls, concrete bollards, guard rails, hand rails, pergolas, bumper fence posts, flanged fence posts, animal enclosures in the nature of corrals and dog runs | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1963 |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of fences, namely, barricades, basketweave, board on board, decorative, flat top gate, garden, grapestake, hi-low dog ear, lattice/lattice tops, lead free, non-climbable, ornamental, porch rail, privacy, razon ribbon, round rail, round top gate, security, shadow weave, slatted, snow, split rail, stockade and temporary construction, chain link fences, non-metal wire fences, wire mesh/barbed wire fences, vinyl fences, vinyl coated fences, wood fences, PVC fences, picket fences, arbors and trellises made of wood, concrete retaining walls, concrete bollards, guard rails, hand rails, pergolas, bumper fence posts, flanged fence posts, animal enclosures in the nature of corrals and dog runs | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1963 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 16, 2025 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 27, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 26, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Aug 17, 2023 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2022 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | TTPR | BOARD DECISION SET ASIDE; PROCEEDING REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 18, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |