Drawing for VOLTE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 85090743

VOLTE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOLTE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean Ploen

SEAN PLOEN PLOEN LAW FIRM, PC100 S 5TH ST STE 1900MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1267UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrotechnical and electronic devices for harvesting mechanical energy, energy conversion, and energy generation, namely, power sources for sensors and actuators for pollutants, heat, motion, location detection, communication, pressure and electricity, vibration sensors, vibration meters, radio receivers, radio transmitters, piezo electric sensors, piezo electric actuators, and optical transmitters; weighing, signaling, measuring, counting, recording, monitoring, testing, and open- and closed-loop control and switching devices, namely, radio-controlled switches, electric sensors and electric actuators for pollutants, location detection, communication, heat, motion, pressure and electricityACTIVE—
042Engineering consulting services in the field of mechanical energy harvesting; engineering consulting services concerning systems for transforming wind, water and human motion into energy; product research, design and development services in connection with devices for mechanical energy harvestingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 28, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 1, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 23, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 23, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 25, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 23, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 24, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance