Drawing for FANCANDY

USPTO serial 85092829

FANCANDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FANCANDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Richman

Monica B. Richman Dentons US LLPWACKER DR. STATION, 233 SOUTH WACKER DR.P.O. BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of social television, namely, online interactive communication between users in the context of television or related to television contentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 16, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 21, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 20, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 15, 2011IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2011INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Aug 25, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 10, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 10, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 10, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 21, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 17, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance