USPTO serial 85092883
BELLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BELLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aaron T. Olejniczak
AARON T OLEJNICZAK ANDRUS SCEALES STARKE & SAWALL LLP100 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUESUITE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious and semi-precious crystal stones and beads for use in jewelry | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |