USPTO serial 85093228
CHINGGIS KHAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHINGGIS KHAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ulaanbaatar 36, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth A. Linford
ELIZABETH A LINFORD LADAS & PARRY LLP5670 WILSHIRE BLVDSUITE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Vodka | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |