USPTO serial 85093758
ULTRATECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRATECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam R. Bialek
ADAM R BIALEK WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN DICK150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017 5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Air purification apparatus for removing airborne contaminants in building installations through air sterilization by ultraviolet radiation | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |