USPTO serial 85093767
PUREROBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4434564Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 19, 2013
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PUREROBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine F. Hoffman
Catherine F. Hoffman Dickinson Wright PLLC350 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 1750Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | A robotic device used to inspect and acquire data for the assessment and non-destructive testing of structures, namely, pipelines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Pipeline inspection services; consulting services in the area of assessment and non-destructive testing of pipelines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PURE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by PURE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by PURE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PUREROBOT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |