USPTO serial 85094696
ATLANTICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATLANTICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cidade Alta, Luanda, AO
Cidade Alta, Luanda, AO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker BAKER & RANNELLS, PA92 E Main St., Suite 302Somerville, NJ 08876UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking; Banking and financing services; Insurance services, namely, brokerage services, administration services and loss control management for others; financial affairs and monetary affairs, namely, financial information, management and analysis services; financial services, namely, money lending, wealth management services, business fundraising for others, investment advice and management, and providing on-line stored value accounts in an electronic environment; banking services; credit services, namely, credit consultation services; credit card services, debit card services, and prepaid card services, namely, online prepaid card services and prepaid card services offered through cards with stored value; providing electronic processing of checks, credit, debit, cash disbursement and stored-value deposit access; check verification and check cashing services; automated teller machine banking services; processing of financial transactions on-line via a computer database or via telecommunications and by telecommunications at the point of sale; processing of financial transactions by cardholders via automatic teller machines; providing bank account information on balances, deposits and withdrawals of money to cardholders via automatic teller machines; travel insurance services, namely, underwriting and brokerage; issuing and redemption of traveller's checks and travel vouchers; buyer authentication services, namely, provision of services relating to the authentication of cardholders, merchants and banks for payment card transactions; verification of financial information, namely, credit card and check verification; electronic transfer of currency exchange funds; financial information provided by computer via a secure computer information network; remote payment services, namely, providing electronic funds and currency transfer services; stored-value electronic purse services, namely, providing online stored value accounts in an electronic environment; electronic funds and currency transfer; electronic payments, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; prepaid telecommunications calling card services; cash disbursement and authorization and settlement of financial transactions; providing debit and credit services by means of radio frequency identification devices, namely, transponders; providing debit and credit services by means of communication and telecommunication devices; issuing and refunds of traveller's checks and travel vouchers; providing financial services to support retail services provided by mobile telecommunications means, namely, payment transaction services via wireless devices; providing financial services to support retail services, namely, payment transaction processing services, provided on-line, via networks or other electronic means using electronically digitized information; bill payment services provided via a website; on-line banking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |