Drawing for CIRT

USPTO serial 85095033

CIRT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIRT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. Burlingame

Robert B. Burlingame Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPCalendar/Docketing DepartmentP.O. BOX 2824San Francisco, CA 94126-2824

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Emergency rescue services, namely, providing emergency rescue services to individuals at incident sites requiring penetration of structures and structural debris; Consulting services in the field of emergency rescue involving the breaching of structuresACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 21, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 21, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 21, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 26, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 23, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 21, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 7, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 21, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 24, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 21, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 26, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 26, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 31, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance