Drawing for KITCHEN KING

USPTO serial 85096242

KITCHEN KING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KITCHEN KING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029(Filed without Basis) Coconut oil and fat; Dehydrated fruit snacks; Dried fruit-based snacks; Frozen, frosted, preserved, processed, dried, cooked or crystallized fruit and vegetables extracts for use in prepared meals or food; Fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of foods; Fruit-based food beverage; Nut and seed-based snack bars; Nut-based snack foods, namely, nut clusters; Palm oil for food; Potato-based snack foods; Refrigerated food package combinations consisting primarily of meat, cheese or processed vegetables for purposes of creating a sandwich; Sesame oil; Snack mix consisting of wasabi peas, processed nuts, dehydrated fruit and/or raisins; Snack mix consisting primarily of dehydrated fruits, processed nuts and also including sesame sticks; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed nuts and salted squash seeds and also including toasted corn; Sunflower oil(Based on Intent to Use) Canola oil; Corn oil; Dried lentils; Edible oils; Peanut oil; Pickled cucumbers; Pickled fruits; Pickled jalapenos; Pickled radishes; Pickled vegetables; Pickled vegetables in soy sauce, soybean paste or vinegar; Pickles; Pulses; Sesame oil; Spicy pickles; Vegetable oilsACTIVE—
030(Filed without Basis) Buckwheat flour; Cereal-based snack foods; Corn-based snack foods; Grain-based snack foods; Potato flour; Puffed corn snacks; Rice-based snack foods; Salt for preserving food; Snack cakes; Wheat-based snack foods(Based on Intent to Use) Baking spices; Biscuits; Corn flour; Edible flour; Pickle relish; Pickled ginger; Rice; Rice flour; Rice noodles; Spices; Wheat flourACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance