USPTO serial 85096242
KITCHEN KING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KITCHEN KING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Filed without Basis) Coconut oil and fat; Dehydrated fruit snacks; Dried fruit-based snacks; Frozen, frosted, preserved, processed, dried, cooked or crystallized fruit and vegetables extracts for use in prepared meals or food; Fruit concentrates and purees used as ingredients of foods; Fruit-based food beverage; Nut and seed-based snack bars; Nut-based snack foods, namely, nut clusters; Palm oil for food; Potato-based snack foods; Refrigerated food package combinations consisting primarily of meat, cheese or processed vegetables for purposes of creating a sandwich; Sesame oil; Snack mix consisting of wasabi peas, processed nuts, dehydrated fruit and/or raisins; Snack mix consisting primarily of dehydrated fruits, processed nuts and also including sesame sticks; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; Snack mix consisting primarily of processed nuts and salted squash seeds and also including toasted corn; Sunflower oil(Based on Intent to Use) Canola oil; Corn oil; Dried lentils; Edible oils; Peanut oil; Pickled cucumbers; Pickled fruits; Pickled jalapenos; Pickled radishes; Pickled vegetables; Pickled vegetables in soy sauce, soybean paste or vinegar; Pickles; Pulses; Sesame oil; Spicy pickles; Vegetable oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | (Filed without Basis) Buckwheat flour; Cereal-based snack foods; Corn-based snack foods; Grain-based snack foods; Potato flour; Puffed corn snacks; Rice-based snack foods; Salt for preserving food; Snack cakes; Wheat-based snack foods(Based on Intent to Use) Baking spices; Biscuits; Corn flour; Edible flour; Pickle relish; Pickled ginger; Rice; Rice flour; Rice noodles; Spices; Wheat flour | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |