Drawing for ALTERRA HOUSE BLEND

USPTO serial 85098076

ALTERRA HOUSE BLEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALTERRA HOUSE BLEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cristina A. Carvalho

CRISTINA A. CARVALHO ARENT FOX LLPTM DOCKET1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services, mail order, catalog and online retail store services featuring coffee, electric and non-electric coffee, espresso, tea and hot chocolate brewers, makers and preparation equipment and accessories, beverage cups and containersACTIVE—
043Services for providing food and drink; restaurants, cafes, coffee shops, coffee bars, tea rooms, cafeterias, canteens, fast food restaurant services, delicatessens, snack bars, self-service restaurants, carry-out restaurants, drive-through restaurant services; catering services; food and beverage preparation services; office and institutional coffee supply servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 20, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 18, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance