USPTO serial 85098520
DREAM DAILY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4324783Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 23, 2013
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DREAM DAILY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dax Alvarez
Dax Alvarez SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 East Van Buren StreetSuite 1900Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | handbags, shoulder bags, tote bags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLOVER CANYON, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by R.N'Ovate, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by R.N'Ovate, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by R.N'Ovate, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named DREAM DAILY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2012 | UNTD | REQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |