USPTO serial 85098797
SMILE NATURALLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 12, 2012
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SMILE NATURALLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Barrie, Ontario, CA
Barrie, Ontario, CA
Barrie, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Williams
Jeffrey Williams Law Office of Jeff Williams PLLC800 E Border St, STE 305Arlington, TX 76010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Tooth Bleaching Gel; Tooth Whitening Gel; [ Tooth Polishing Cream; Toothpaste; ] Tooth Gel; [ Mouthwash; Mouth Rinse; ] Preventative maintenance oral care products comprised of tooth Whitening Gel, [ Gel Applicators, Gel Trays, ] * and * Tooth Cleaning Gels [, Toothpaste, and Rinses sold together as a unit ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 9, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 9, 2022 | PUNQ | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED- NO RESPONSE REQUIRED POU | — |
| Dec 9, 2022 | PUMI | PROOF OF USE INTERIM ACTION ISSUED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 21, 2017 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |