Drawing for ACTIONFLOW

USPTO serial 85099820

ACTIONFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ACTIONFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

STEPHEN L. BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS, PA575 ROUTE 28 STE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869-1354UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and organization assistant services; business management assistance; commercial business appraisals; commercial or industrial company management assistance; business professional consultancy; business management consultancy; personnel consultancy; demonstration of goods; business management assistant services; organization of exhibitions or fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; business investigation; business organization assistant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 14, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 24, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Nov 24, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2010LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance