Drawing for THE SDS VEST

USPTO serial 85099883

THE SDS VEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SDS VEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory W. Carr

GREGORY W. CARR CARR LLP900 JACKSON ST STE 670DALLAS, TX 75202-4425UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices and equipment, namely, non-power operated patient transfer and fall prevention devices in the nature of garments that assist in reducing patient falls and in lifting and moving patientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 10, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 30, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance