Drawing for EPOCRATES EHR

USPTO serial 85100426

EPOCRATES EHR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPOCRATES EHR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne H. Peck

ANNE H. PECK COOLEY LLP777 6TH ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20001-3706UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for accessing and managing data and information related to health care servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 30, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 28, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 24, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance