USPTO serial 85101021
DAIRY DUOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAIRY DUOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORTHFIELD, IL
NORTHFIELD, IL
NORTHFIELD, IL
NORTHFIELD, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan H. Frohling
SUSAN H FROHLING KRAFT CORPORATE & LEGAL AFFAIRS3 LAKES DRIVENORTHFIELD, IL 60093-2753UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese; refrigerated snack combinations, namely, cheese dips or cheese spreads with graham cracker sticks or flatbread crackers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL BRANDS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL BRANDS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KRAFT FOODS GROUP BRANDS LLC
- Other trademarks owned by KRAFT FOODS GROUP BRANDS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named DAIRY DUOS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |