USPTO serial 85101093
BROOKLYN NEW YORKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- โ
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BROOKLYN NEW YORKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Cold Spring Harbor, NY
Cold Spring Harbor, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Kennedy
Paul J. Kennedy Pepper Hamilton LLP18th and Arch Streets3000 Two Logan SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, namely, shirts, jerseys, T-shirts, long sleeve shirts, tank tops, turtle necks, mock turtle necks, jackets, sweat shirts, sweaters, vests, pullovers, shorts, pants, skirts, athletic uniforms, leggings, socks, underwear, sports bras, wristbands, headbands, rain suits, gloves, arm warmers; headwear, hats and caps; footwear | ACTIVE | โ |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Voyticky, Joseph
- Other trademarks owned by Voyticky, Joseph
- Other trademarks owned by Strevalia, James
- Other trademarks owned by Strevalia, James
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BROOKLYN NEW YORKERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | โ |
| Jan 31, 2014 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | โ |
| Nov 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | โ |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | โ |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | โ |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | โ |
| May 30, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | โ |
| May 24, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | โ |
| May 2, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | โ |
| May 2, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | โ |
| Nov 6, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | โ |
| Nov 2, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | โ |
| Nov 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | โ |
| May 23, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | โ |
| May 23, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | โ |
| May 2, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | โ |
| May 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | โ |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | โ |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | โ |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | โ |
| Mar 8, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jan 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Dec 31, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Dec 31, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Dec 31, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 31, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 31, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Aug 11, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |