Drawing for MEDISEE

USPTO serial 85101360

MEDISEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, JEFFERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDISEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harry J. Proctor

HARRY J. PROCTOR SOLOMON WARD SEIDENWURM & SMITH LLP401 B ST STE 1200SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4295UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer application software for mobile phones, smartphones, portable media players, handheld computers and tablets, and computers, namely, software for consumers and patients for accessing and transmitting individual electronic health records (EHRs) to their physicians and other healthcare providers, for physicians and other healthcare providers for use in the management of healthcare practices, and for use by patients in setting their preferences for the transmission and access to their EHRs and portions of their EHRs; Computer software for controlling and managing individual medical information; Downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for patients, physicians and other healthcare providers for accessing and transmitting EHRs to physicians and other healthcare providers and for physisicans and other healthcare providers for use in the management of healthcare practicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 14, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 30, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 30, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 30, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 30, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 18, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance