USPTO serial 85101549
QUADRINONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUADRINONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IRVINE, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
SAN MATEO, CA
San Mateo, CA
Carlsbad, CA
CARLSBAD, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Munson
PETER MUNSON WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI12235 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Anti-inflammatories; medicated skin-care preparations; anti-itch cream; 4-ethoxybenzaldehyde sold as a component of medicated lotions, ointments and creams for treatment of inflammation, itching, eczema, rosacea, psoriasis and thermal, chemical, UV and ionizing radiation burns; 4-ethoxybenzaldehyde sold as a component of medicated lotions, ointments and creams for prevention of radiation burns; 4-ethoxybenzaldehyde sold as a component of medicated sunburn lotions for reducing skin redness and irritation; 4-ethoxybenzaldehyde sold as a component of medicated dandruff products for reducing skin irritation | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLERGAN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MERZ AESTHETICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MERZ AESTHETICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Merz Aesthetics, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SKINMEDICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SKINMEDICA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named QUADRINONE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |