USPTO serial 85102175
AGILITY MADE POSSIBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALVAREZ, COURTNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGILITY MADE POSSIBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Priscilla L. Dunckel
PRISCILLA L. DUNCKEL BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.2001 ROSS AVE STE 600DALLAS, TX 75201-2900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software products, namely, enterprise management software for distributing software among computers, maintaining hardware and software inventories, configuring computers, and protecting local data and managing remote computer systems, computer software for creating and accessing searchable databases of the users' business information by authorized users; computer software for computer application development, computer software for data storage management, database management software, computer software for computer user identification and authentication, password authentication, sign-on control and encryption; computer software for administration of computer local area networks, virtual private networks and wide area networks; computer software for collecting, viewing and analyzing computer hardware inventory data; computer business application software for storage of data, data security protection, data backup, data restoring and data sharing directly for the user or for another application program for use in business; computer software for monitoring and controlling access to global computer networks, computer software for monitoring, tracking, troubleshooting and investigating web infrastructure; and computer software for data retention and data indexing to demonstrate best practices with regulations applicable to the industry for use in the fields of data communications and telecommunications; computer software platforms for grid and utility computing and for operating distributed applications and networks of computers; computer software for managing identities and access to data and applications in an organization and within service providers; computer software for providing identity governance, access governance, log management, access management, web services security, service oriented architecture (SOA) security, transaction security and single sign-on; computer software for providing identities, authentication, identity proofing and identity assurance to users, companies, applications, application providers and service providers; computer software platforms for implementing virtualization technologies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTER ASSOCIATES THINK, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTER ASSOCIATES THINK, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AGILITY MADE POSSIBLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |