USPTO serial 85102294
M2 MODERNIZING MEDICINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M2 MODERNIZING MEDICINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jembaa N. Cole
DAVID J BYER K L GATES LLPSTATE STREET FINANCIAL CENTERONE LINCOLN STREETBOSTON, MA 02111-2950Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology services, namely, information technology consulting services; data services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of electronic medical records / electronic health records to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, transmission, storage and sharing of data; providing computer software solutions, namely, design and development of computer software and on-line computer software systems for healthcare and medical organizations and providers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |