USPTO serial 85102860
BIOLUME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOLUME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Morrisville, NC
Morrisville, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen P. McNamara
STEPHEN P. MCNAMARA ST. ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON & REENS LLC986 BEDFORD STSTAMFORD, CT 06905-5610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | DAIRY-BASED AND NON-DAIRY BASED WHIPPED TOPPINGS; UNFLAVORED AND UNSWEETENED GELATINS AND GELATIN MIXES; HARD AND SOFT CHEESES; PROCESSED CHEESES; BROTH; LIQUID AND DRY SOUP; LIQUID AND DRY SOUP MIXES; DAIRY BASED DIPS; EGGS; FRUIT BASED FILLINGS FOR CAKES AND PIES; YOGURT; JAMS AND JELLIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | PROCESSED CEREALS; CANDY; EDIBLE CAKE DECORATIONS; FROZEN CONFECTIONS; FROSTINGS AND FROSTING MIXES; ICING AND ICING MIXES; TOPPING SYRUPS; ICE CREAM; ICE CREAM SUBSTITUTE; FRUIT ICE; FLAVORED ICES; FLAVORING SYRUPS; ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; BREAD; BISCUITS; CAKES; SAUCES, AND SALAD DRESSINGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |