Drawing for BULLET CELLS

USPTO serial 85102930

BULLET CELLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BULLET CELLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Allison Strickland

J. ALLISON STRICKLAND FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Modular building structures of metal; modular prefabricated building units of metallic materials for the construction of buildings, namely, prison cells and prisonsACTIVE—
019Modular non-metallic building structures; modular prefabricated building units of non-metallic materials for the construction of buildings, namely, prison cells and prisonsACTIVE—
037Construction of modular buildings, namely, prison cells and prisons; repair and maintenance of buildings, namely, prison cells and prisons; information, consultancy and advisory services relating to the aforesaid servicesACTIVE—
042Design services relating to the construction of modular buildings, namely, prison cells and prisons; preparation of technical reports relating to modular building design, namely, prison cells and prisonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 28, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 16, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 16, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 1, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 13, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 27, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance