Drawing for ICR 350

USPTO serial 85103128

ICR 350

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICR 350?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sabrina C. Stavish

SABRINA C. STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Aeronautic engines; aircraft engines; boat engines; engines, other than for land vehicles; internal combustion engines for power generation, other than for land vehicles; gas turbine engines not for land vehicles; industrial engines; jet engines; marine engines; turbines not for land vehicles; micro-turbines not for land vehicles; gas micro-turbine engines not for land vehicles; combinations of engines, turbines and micro-turbines, other than for land vehicles; replacement parts for the aboveACTIVE—
012Engines for land vehicles; automobile engines; motorcycle engines; internal combustion engines for power generation, for land vehicles; gas turbine engines for land vehicles; gas micro-turbine engines for land vehicles; turbines for land vehicles; micro-turbines for land vehicles; combinations of engines, turbines and micro-turbines, for land vehicles; replacement parts for the aboveACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 8, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 6, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 11, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 18, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 19, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance