USPTO serial 85103200
WEARCON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEARCON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donn K. Harms
DONN K HARMS AMERICAN PATENT TRADEMARK LAW CENTER12702 VIA CORTINA STE 100DEL MAR, CA 92014 3769UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Belts; Bottoms; Caps; Dresses; Hats; Headwear; Jackets; Leggings; Pants; Shirts; Shorts; Socks; Sweat bands; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; Sweat Shorts; Sweat Suits; Tops; Vests; Visors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 22, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |