Drawing for OLYMPUS VR

USPTO serial 85103308

OLYMPUS VR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLYMPUS VR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Rosini, Esq.

JAMES E ROSINI KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital camerasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 21, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 5, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 14, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 14, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 14, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 14, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance