USPTO serial 85103665
DOTA-ALLSTARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOTA-ALLSTARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan M. Kent
Evan M. Kent Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP11377 W. Olympic Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software; video game software; computer and video game software for use on console platforms, namely, global communications network capable and connectable systems for individual, peer-to-peer, online and multiplayer play; computer game programs for use in connection with multiplayer interactive games played over a global communication network; video game software for use on handheld game systems, mobile phones, portable USB drives and personal digital assistants; HD-DVD, optical and magneto-optical discs featuring computer games, movies based on computer games, and computer game-related content; DVDs, CDs, downloadable MP3 files, and CD-ROMs featuring musical scores and dialogue; computer programs for use in tracking the status of various users of online interactive gaming services, and for matching online game players with other players of all skill levels | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line interactive discussion forums for gamers and computer game players; providing online community forums for gamers and computer game players; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among gamers and computer game players in the field of computer games; providing online community forums for gamers and computer game players | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-line computer game for others over global and local area computer networks; providing interactive online computer games via the World Wide Web; providing information about online computer games and video games via the World Wide Web; providing online multiplayer interactive computer and video games provided over the World Wide Web; providing on-line computer game information in the nature of trivia, tips and strategies for computer games; fan club services; organization of online interactive computer games, namely, matching online game players with other players of all skill levels; arranging and conducting competitions for video gamers and computer game players; arranging online computer and video game competitions for interactive game players | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2012 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 28, 2012 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |