Drawing for HI-TECH SEALS INC. SPECIALISTES EN ETANCHEITE ET SERVICE

USPTO serial 85104071

HI-TECH SEALS INC. SPECIALISTES EN ETANCHEITE ET SERVICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HI-TECH SEALS INC. SPECIALISTES EN ETANCHEITE ET SERVICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott T. Griggs

SCOTT T. GRIGGS GRIGGS BERGEN LLP17950 PRESTON RD STE 1000DALLAS, TX 75252-5662UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanical seals, namely, o-ring seals, oil seals, back-up ring seals, U-cup seals, piston seals, rod seals, rod wipers and wiper rings; Tool rebuild kits, namely, kits including replacement seals, gaskets, fasteners and tool rebuilding instructions; Measurement tools, namely, o-ring measuring cones; Optical inspection equipment, namely, magnification tools; CD-ROMs (pre-recorded) containing computer software in the field of design, engineering, and manufacturing of mechanical seals; Printed materials, namely, brochures, charts, flyers, folders, technical newsletters, calendars, business cards, shipping labels, playing cards, stickers, event schedule charts, sign boards and banners; Stationery, namely, letterhead, binders, notepads, envelopes, quality acceptance forms, customer quote forms, invoice forms and packing slips; Office equipment, namely, staplers, staple removers, staples, rulers, rubber stamps and packing tape; Shipping boxes, namely, plastic or metal heavy-duty cases; Promotional novelty items, namely, mugs, business card holders, CD cases, chocolate, clocks, drink coasters, crib boards, golf ball markers, golf balls, divot repair tools, tees, towels, putters, flashlights, mints, computer mouse pads, magnetic signs to put on vehicles, plastic cups, stress balls, water bottles, insulated cooler bags and household utensils, namely, crab shellers, knives and wine openers; Clothing, namely, golf shirts, dress shirts, T-shirts, hats and jackets; Spherical ball bearings; Design and engineering services in the field of mechanical seals; Custom manufacturing services in the field of mechanical sealsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 5, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 3, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance