Drawing for OUTBREAKER

USPTO serial 85104076

OUTBREAKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OUTBREAKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Games, namely, game software for use on computers, wireless devices and handheld devices and video game softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 14, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 25, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 31, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 31, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 31, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 31, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 7, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 25, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 2, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 2, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 2, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Aug 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance